Skip to content

Vucic's party wins parliamentary election in Serbia

Absolute majority within reach

Vucic casting his vote. The new elections had become necessary after the president dissolved....aussiedlerbote.de
Vucic casting his vote. The new elections had become necessary after the president dissolved parliament..aussiedlerbote.de

Vucic's party wins parliamentary election in Serbia

Vucic's plan has worked: His Serbian Progressive Party increased its majority in the early elections in Serbia. Observers assume that the president also used illegal methods to increase his power.

According to election researchers, President Aleksandar Vucic's party has won the parliamentary elections in Serbia. After counting 80 percent of the votes cast, the Belgrade-based institutes Cesid and Ipsos saw the Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) as the clear winner with 46 percent of the vote.

Compared to the previous election 17 months ago, the SNS gained two percentage points. If this remains the case, it would single-handedly have an absolute majority of 129 seats in the 250-seat People's Assembly (Skupstina). The liberal opposition, which this time ran together as the electoral alliance "Serbia against Violence", won 23% of the vote and can expect 64 seats. The Socialist Party of Serbia (SPS) led by Foreign Minister Ivica Dacic came third with 7 percent of the vote and 18 seats. It has been governing in a coalition with the SNS since 2012.

Vucic has not formally been SNS chairman since May, but continues to determine the fate of the party. He was heavily involved in the election campaign. The SNS was on the ballot paper as a list with the name "Aleksandar Vucic - Serbia must not stand still". The opposition and election researchers accused the presidential party of around 450 violations of the election rules. Among other things, votes had been bought and people from the Serbian part of Bosnia had been brought to Belgrade in buses to vote there.

Critics: thugs silence opposition members

Vucic dissolved parliament after less than two years. The president, who has been in charge of the country's politics in various capacities since 2012, repeatedly uses early elections to ensure the loyalty of his officials and supporters. Critics accuse him of having an authoritarian style of government. According to these voices, Vucic abuses the government apparatus, police and secret services in order to ruin political rivals economically and defame them in public. At the same time, those in power around Vucic are in league with organized crime, according to the observers. Assaults on members of the opposition are often carried out by thugs from this milieu.

The main triggers for bringing forward the election were two rampages in May with 18 deaths and conflicts in Kosovo, which has been independent since 2008. Serbia continues to claim its former province, which is now almost exclusively inhabited by Albanians, as its own. The killings in May triggered a massive protest movement against the Vucic government. It accused the government and its media of fomenting a climate of hatred and glorification of violence. As a result, the liberal opposition joined forces to form the electoral alliance "Serbia against Violence". Its politicians and supporters hope to conquer the capital in local elections, which took place at the same time.

Elections were also held on Sunday for the Chamber of Deputies of the semi-autonomous northern province of Vojvodina and 65 of 197 municipal councils in the country, including the one in Belgrade. The state election commission will announce the provisional final results tomorrow.

Read also:

Source: www.ntv.de

Comments

Latest

US President Joe Biden delivers remarks on the Supreme Court's immunity ruling at the Cross Hall of...

Biden campaign chair gives a staunch defense of the president’s health to donors, says campaign is clear-eyed about debate

President Joe Biden’s campaign chair on Monday told members of the campaign’s National Finance Committee that the team is “clear-eyed, not pollyannish” after the president’s poor debate performance, two participants on the call told CNN, but offered no indication Biden was reconsidering his bid...

Members Public