Supreme Court allows Trump to play for time
Special prosecutor Smith wants to hold Donald Trump criminally accountable for his role in the storming of the Capitol. It is unclear whether this is even possible - Trump was still in office at the time and therefore immune. The Supreme Court does not want to deal with the issue for the time being. This suits Trump's delaying tactics.
Former US President Donald Trump is playing for time in the charges against him for attempted electoral fraud - and has now scored a success. The US Supreme Court has announced that it will not deal with the issue of Trump's immunity for the time being. This means that the planned date for the election fraud trial against Trump in the US capital Washington at the beginning of March can no longer be kept.
The decision is a bitter blow for special prosecutor Jack Smith, who has indicted Trump for his attempts to overturn the result of the 2020 presidential election. Meanwhile, new audio material has emerged that is said to prove how Trump exerted pressure on election workers after the election. Special Prosecutor Smith had asked the Supreme Court to quickly clarify whether Trump can be prosecuted at federal level for his behavior after the election three years ago - or whether he is protected by his immunity as president. On January 6, 2021, Trump's supporters stormed the seat of parliament in Washington, incited by a speech by the then still-president. Five people died as a result of the riots.
Trump's lawyers argued that the Republican could not be legally prosecuted for acts that were part of his duties as president. However, the judge in charge of the case had rejected a corresponding application. Trump's team had appealed against this decision - so the ball is now in the court of appeal's court. But Special Prosecutor Smith chose an unusual route: he wanted to bypass the Court of Appeal and turned directly to the Supreme Court with a request to quickly clarify the question of whether ex-presidents enjoy immunity from prosecution at federal level: "This case involves issues of exceptional national importance." However, the Supreme Court has now rejected his request without giving reasons.
The appeal must therefore make its way through the courts, which may take some time. An oral hearing before an appeals court is scheduled for January 9. It can be assumed that the case will end up back at the Supreme Court after the court's decision. A trial against Trump in Washington at the beginning of March is therefore unlikely, as it will have to wait for the decision of the highest court.
Trump is also alleged to have tried to manipulate results in Michigan
Trump, who is still facing further criminal charges, wants to enter the White House once again for the Republicans. The 77-year-old is leading by a wide margin in internal party polls - the primaries for the candidacy begin in a few weeks. So far, everything points to a re-run of the election campaign between Trump and incumbent President Joe Biden. Trump is counting on delaying the trials against him until after the election. If he wins, he could ask his Attorney General to drop the federal investigation against him.
At the same time, a report in the Detroit News newspaper caused a stir in the USA. The newspaper wrote about an audio recording of Trump from November 2020, which it said it had obtained. In it, Trump is said to have pressured two election officials not to certify the election results for an important district in the US state of Michigan. In response to the report, Trump spokesman Steven Cheung stated that "all actions were taken by President Trump in fulfillment of his duty as President of the United States to faithfully uphold the law and ensure the integrity of elections". Trump's alleged phone call fits into the Republican's pattern at the time of urging officials, election officials and politicians not to accept the results of the presidential election.
Read also:
- Year of climate records: extreme is the new normal
- Precautionary arrests show Islamist terror threat
- UN vote urges Israel to ceasefire
- SPD rules out budget resolution before the end of the year
The US Supreme Court's decision not to immediately address former President Donald Trump's immunity in the case of his alleged involvement in the 2020 election results manipulation in Michigan, particularly in the state of Michigan, has delayed the potential trial against him. This could potentially give Trump an advantage in his bid for the US presidential election in 2024, should he win the party's nomination.
Meanwhile, new evidence has emerged, such as audio recordings, suggesting that Trump pressured election officials in Michigan to not certify election results, adding to the mounting allegations against him in relation to the 2020 US presidential election.
Source: www.ntv.de
