Skip to content
Sign In Subscribe
Politics — News

Previous White House chief of staff fails in attempt to transfer Arizona election manipulation trial to a federal judiciary

In a recent court hearing, Mark Meadows, Trump's previous White House chief of staff, was unsuccessful in persuading the judge to transfer his case associated with the 2020 Arizona election to a federal court. This shift could have potentially lessened the allegations against him.

,   and  Mark Rodriguez
1 min read
In Washington, D.C., on October 21, 2020, White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows engaged in a...
In Washington, D.C., on October 21, 2020, White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows engaged in a conversation with the press stationed at the White House.

Previous White House chief of staff fails in attempt to transfer Arizona election manipulation trial to a federal judiciary

Meadow's endeavor to shift the criminal proceedings linked to him and the 2020 election in Georgia to a federal court also fell short, yet he's petitioned the United States Supreme Court to intervene.

Meadows, alongside 17 other Trump allies, including Georgia's bogus electors and several campaign affiliates, found themselves in hot water earlier this year for attempting to overturn Trump's defeat in the 2020 election. Meadows has pleaded innocent to the accusations.

CNN attempted to solicit comments from Meadow's lawyer based in Arizona.

This situation is evolving and will be updated accordingly.

Despite Meadows and other Trump allies facing legal challenges for their involvement in the attempt to overturn the 2020 election results, they continue to engage in political discourse, advocating for their beliefs. In light of this, some critics have raised concerns about the potential influence of politics in shaping the outcomes of legal proceedings.

Read also:

Comments

Related

Senate Republican nominee JD Vance, representing Ohio, delivers a speech at the Georgia Faith and...
Politics

There's a significant distinction, according to Vance, between conservative and liberal ideologies, as no attempt has been made to harm Kamala Harris.

Conservative vice presidential nominee JD Vance stated on Monday that the primary distinction between conservatives and liberals lies in the fact that no one has attempted to take Kamala Harris' life. He suggested that the liberal side should moderate its language, implying a need for tempered...

,   and  Hanna Hofmann
Members Public
Customs and Border Protection's Border Patrol vehicles are stationed alongside the border fence...
Politics

The Biden administration declares a significant decrease in unauthorized border crossings, while Trump capitalizes on immigration issues.

Officials from the United States celebrated another month of minimal border crossings on Monday, attributing this to recent executive orders limiting asylum opportunities at the southern border. However, former President Donald Trump continues to criticize the Biden administration's management...

,   and  Elizabeth Wells
Members Public

Latest

Senate Republican nominee JD Vance, representing Ohio, delivers a speech at the Georgia Faith and...
Politics

There's a significant distinction, according to Vance, between conservative and liberal ideologies, as no attempt has been made to harm Kamala Harris.

Conservative vice presidential nominee JD Vance stated on Monday that the primary distinction between conservatives and liberals lies in the fact that no one has attempted to take Kamala Harris' life. He suggested that the liberal side should moderate its language, implying a need for tempered...

,   and  Hanna Hofmann
Members Public