Skip to content

EU Commission releases blocked billions for Hungary

Brussels and Budapest have been arguing about the state of the judiciary in Hungary for years. Now the EU Commission is accommodating Hungary's President Orban - shortly before the EU summit on Ukraine.

Will the release of the funds affect Viktor Orban's threat to block the EU summit? Photo.aussiedlerbote.de
Will the release of the funds affect Viktor Orban's threat to block the EU summit? Photo.aussiedlerbote.de

Finances - EU Commission releases blocked billions for Hungary

The European Commission is releasing ten billion euros in frozen EU funds for Hungary - despite ongoing criticism of the rule of law in the country. The Brussels authority justified the move by stating that Hungary had fulfilled the necessary requirements. Other budget funds amounting to almost twelve billion euros and billions in coronavirus aid remain blocked.

EU Justice Commissioner Didier Reynders explained that Hungary had fulfilled all the agreed requirements with the latest judicial reforms and that there were now sufficient guarantees that the independence of the judiciary in Hungary could be said to have been strengthened. However, today's decision is not the end of the process. The situation will continue to be monitored closely and the government will react in good time if there are any setbacks.

Veto threats from Hungary

It is now eagerly awaited whether the release of the funds will have an impact on the blockade threatened by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban at the upcoming EU summit.

At their summit meeting in Brussels on Thursday and Friday, the heads of state and government of the European Union want to decide on the start of EU accession negotiations with Ukraine. The meeting will also discuss the long-term EU budget for the period 2021 to 2027. However, Hungary has threatened to veto both issues.

Orban argued that the European Commission's proposal for the start of accession negotiations was not compatible with a summit decision from June 2022.

He was alluding to the fact that the Brussels authority is recommending the start regardless of reform requirements that have not yet been fully met. However, the summit decision states that further steps in the accession process should only be decided once "all these conditions have been fully met".

This applies regardless of the fact that the start of EU accession negotiations would primarily be a symbolic step, as the talks are likely to take many years and Ukraine 's accession before the end of the Russian war of aggression is considered impossible. He described the Commission's proposal on the draft budget as insubstantial, unbalanced and unrealistic.

In the end, it remained unclear whether Orban only wanted to increase the pressure in order to obtain the frozen subsidies for his country. Some EU diplomats believe this is conceivable, while others point out that Orban recently claimed that he would not back down on the issue of Ukraine even after the release of funds.

Criticism of the decision

The European Parliament sharply criticized the EU Commission's decision. Green MEP Daniel Freund said: "Ursula von der Leyen is now paying the biggest bribe in the history of the EU - ten billion euros - to the autocrat and Putin friend Viktor Orban." The leaders of the Christian Democrat, Social Democrat and Liberal groups in the European Parliament also accused the authority of unjustly releasing the money.

The EU Commission, on the other hand, said: If you do not want to make yourself vulnerable, you should not continue to withhold the ten billion euros after the recent Hungarian reforms. However, it is annoying that the decision now has to be made directly before the EU summit this Thursday and Friday and that the impression is now being created that there could be a connection with blockade threats by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban.

The EU had blocked the funds amounting to around 22 billion euros due to concerns that too little was being done to combat corruption and uphold the rule of law under Prime Minister Orban. The EU Commission has been accusing Hungary of undermining EU standards and fundamental values for years. The authority has launched a number of infringement proceedings and taken Hungary to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) several times.

Read also:

  1. Despite the ongoing criticism of Hungary's rule of law by the European Parliament, the European Commission is releasing ten billion euros in frozen EU funds for Hungary.
  2. EU Justice Commissioner Didier Reynders stated that Hungary had fulfilled the necessary requirements for the release of these funds, citing strengthened guarantees for the independence of the judiciary.
  3. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has threatened to veto both the start of EU accession negotiations with Ukraine and the EU's long-term budget at the upcoming EU summit in Brussels.
  4. Orban argued that the European Commission's proposal for the start of EU accession negotiations was not compatible with a summit decision from June 2022, citing unfulfilled reform requirements.
  5. The EU Commission, however, states that the release of the funds is not connected to the blockade threats by Viktor Orban, as the decision to release the money had to be made directly before the EU summit.
  6. The funds had been blocked by the EU due to concerns over corruption and the rule of law under Prime Minister Orban, and the EU Commission has accused Hungary of undermining EU standards and fundamental values for years.
  7. The decision to release the funds for Hungary has been sharply criticized by the European Parliament, with Green MEP Daniel Freund referring to it as the "biggest bribe in the history of the EU."

Source: www.stern.de

Comments

Latest

Grave accusations levied against JVA staff members in Bavaria

Grave accusations levied against JVA staff members in Bavaria

Grave accusations levied against JVA staff members in Bavaria The Augsburg District Attorney's Office is currently investigating several staff members of the Augsburg-Gablingen prison (JVA) on allegations of severe prisoner mistreatment. The focus of the investigation is on claims of bodily harm in the workplace. It's

Members Public