UN resolution for ceasefire in Gaza adopted
Although the call for an immediate ceasefire is only symbolic in the context of the UN General Assembly, it does provide a picture of the mood. However, the resolution paper passed by a two-thirds majority is not enough for Germany.
The UN General Assembly has passed a resolution calling for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. The paper introduced by Egypt achieved the necessary two-thirds majority in New York. 152 countries voted in favor, 10 against. 23 countries abstained, including Germany.
The resolution presented Germany with "a difficult decision", according to the Federal Foreign Office via the short message service X. "We want to end the unbearable suffering of the people - in Israel and in Gaza". The resolution calls for a "blanket ceasefire, but does not say why Israel is forced to defend itself: Because Hamas barbarically attacked Israel on Oct. 7. And because Hamas wants to continue destroying Israel." That is why Germany could not agree - but because it wanted to work to end the suffering of the Palestinians, it could not vote against it either.
UN General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding, but are considered symbolic. They also provide an insight into the mood of the world: alongside the Arab world, the majority of countries in the Global South voted in favor. The countries of the European Union presented a mixed picture: While the UK, for example, abstained alongside Germany, France and Greece, among others, voted in favor. Among those voting against were Israel, the USA, Paraguay, Austria and Guatemala.
A total of 152 countries voted in favor of the resolution, significantly more than at the end of October, when 120 countries at the UN General Assembly voted for a resolution to improve the humanitarian situation and for an immediate ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. At that time, 14 voted against and 45 abstained, including Germany. The UN General Assembly has 193 members, but for various reasons not all of them always vote.
UN Security Council failed in its endeavor
The resolution that has now been passed, with its call for a lasting ceasefire, goes significantly further than the demand for at least a temporary ceasefire at the time. The document also expresses great concern about the "catastrophic humanitarian situation" in the Gaza Strip and calls for the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages. Previously, amendments to the resolution had been introduced which, among other things, clearly mentioned the Islamist Hamas and clearly condemned the massacre of October 7. However, these failed to achieve the necessary two-thirds majority.
The more powerful UN Security Council, whose resolutions are binding, once again failed to pass a ceasefire resolution last week. The body had previously only passed one resolution with a humanitarian focus on the conflict, mainly because the USA had always backed Israel. The adoption of the resolution by the UN General Assembly is also a reaction to the events in the Security Council.
UN Secretary-General António Guterres had personally urged the Security Council to support such a humanitarian ceasefire. In a corresponding letter to the Council, he referred to Article 99 of the UN Charter. This allows the Secretary-General to bring to the attention of the Security Council "any matter which, in his opinion, may endanger the maintenance of international peace and security" and, according to the UN, had not been applied for decades.
Read also:
- Year of climate records: extreme is the new normal
- Precautionary arrests show Islamist terror threat
- SPD rules out budget resolution before the end of the year
- Numerous oil, gas and coal lobbyists at climate conference
The UN General Assembly's resolution for an immediate ceasefire in the Gaza Strip, following the Israel war, is a point of contention for Germany, as it neither supports Israel's defensive actions nor wants to oppose the amelioration of the Palestinians' suffering. Despite not being legally binding, UN General Assembly resolutions provide a glimpse into global sentiments, with a majority of countries favoring the ceasefire, including those from the Arab world and the Global South.
Despite the UN General Assembly's resolution, the UN Security Council, whose resolutions are binding, failed to pass a ceasefire resolution concerning the Israel war. The Security Council's inability to act led to the adoption of the resolution by the General Assembly, emphasizing the urgent need for a ceasefire and addressing the catastrophic humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip.
Source: www.ntv.de
