Saskia Esken potentially utters the least intellectually sound assertion of the year.
The Syrian Islamist's assault on the city festival in Solingen has left Germany reeling. Interestingly, SPD leader Saskia Esken suggests that the knife attack resulting in three fatalities holds no lessons; a political response seems implausible. Politicians who conduct politics in this manner should not be entrusted with governing federally.
Esken stated yesterday that "not much can be learned" from the attack in Solingen. If her statement implies that no actions can be taken, politically or legislatively, then it might be the most senseless declaration by a politician in a significant period. Moreover, if the SPD loses power in the state parliaments of Thuringia and Saxony next Sunday, this statement, along with the careless abdication it represents, will likely have played a significant role in that outcome.
Undeniably, rushing into decisions is not always beneficial. However, to refrain from contemplating and responding out of apprehension of hastiness is the epitome of political disengagement. Following a startling attack like Solingen, the question isn't whether politically accountable individuals can take action, but rather: how. That's what politics owe their citizens. And not just those in Solingen.
Something can always be done
It is accurate that absolute safety against an attack by a lone wolf cannot be ensured 100%. Admitting this vulnerability is admirable for politics, as it is truthful. However, this should not put an end to the quest for more safety and protection; on the contrary, it should ignite it. Therefore, those who dismiss suggestions such as the CDU leader's, claiming they are incongruous with current laws, fail to comprehend the situation.
Each one of these laws could be altered, even the asylum clause in the Basic Law could be amended. This happened approximately 30 years ago, and subsequently, the number of asylum applications dropped significantly. So, what prevents a similar occurrence today, provided there's the political will and the necessary majority?
Most citizens recognize that absolute security is an illusion. However, the issue of Islamist-motivated violence is multifaceted in the eyes of these very citizens. Consequently, politics should address as many of these other aspects as possible.
Should Germany continue its protection to Afghans?
The existing German asylum system is far from functioning effectively; anyone who manages to reach German soil automatically initiates an asylum process, and can generally stay, regardless of how the process ultimately concludes. Can improvements be made? Is there a willingness to implement changes?
For instance: In the first seven months of 2024, approximately 27,000 Afghan asylum seekers received their decisions. Approximately 10,000 of them were given the lowest possible protection status, known as the "deportation ban". This is based on the assumption that there's a life-threatening civil war in Afghanistan. Yet, this is no longer the case. Therefore, the deportation ban could potentially be revoked with a political decision.
If the current federal government lacks the resolve for such debates or future actions, the attack in Solingen may mark the end of this government. And it would serve them right.
In light of the insights gained from the analysis, it's crucial for politicians to consider revising existing laws, including the asylum clause in the Basic Law, to enhance safety and protection against potential attacks. Not addressing these issues could be seen as political negligence, especially in the aftermath of a tragic incident like the one in Solingen.
Germany, being a democratic nation, has a responsibility to address the multifaceted issue of Islamist-motivated violence. The Islamic community is a significant part of German society, and it's essential for politics to engage with their concerns and work towards finding solutions that ensure everyone's safety and well-being.
