Defense counselors downplay potential risks from accused parties
In the ongoing trial at the Munich Higher Regional Court, eight individuals accused of being part of the Reuß group, a notorious anti-government organization, stand charged. The group, uncovered through a massive anti-terror operation spanning multiple federal states and foreign territories at the end of 2022, allegedly planned a violent coup against the federal government, considering the loss of innocent lives as acceptable collateral.
Reuß aimed to establish a new form of government, and several defendants, such as J. and R., were believed to have held influential roles within the group, similar to a cabinet of a legitimate government. The "Council" in this association, as it was called, consisted of key members, including J. and R.
J.'s defense counsel raised doubts about J.'s terrorist inclinations, suggesting that his educational background as a Waldorf student, known for promoting peace, and his interests in esotericism, made him more of a suspect than a threat. The discovery of a book on human reptiles in J.'s possession was brought up, but his counsel argued that this was not evidence of true belief. Furthermore, certain diary entries interpreted out of context by the Federal Prosecutor's Office were alleged to have been distorted. Internal speeches given by J., particularly one that labeled foreign policy as "esoterically healthy," were re-framed as merely symbolic by J.'s lawyer.
Dr. R.'s defense lawyer maintained that his client did not condone violence, had no hand in planned insurrections, and posed no imminent danger. The radicalization of Dr. R. questioned by the prosecution was called into question by the defense.
The Federal Prosecutor accuses the eight defendants in Munich of founding or joining a terrorist organization, as well as preparing acts of high treason. This is the third nationwide trial against the Reuß group, with parallel proceedings in Frankfurt and Stuttgart focusing on the alleged ring leaders and the "military wing" of the group, respectively.
Defense attorneys have criticized the fragmented nature of the three trials, questioning the competence of Munich as the trial location and requesting the termination of proceedings. Requests for delayed trials until access to additional documents, such as telephone surveillance recordings, were granted have also been made. Only one of the eight defendants, the self-proclaimed astrologer L., has expressed interest in testifying at a yet-to-be-scheduled date.
Read also:
Despite the defense counselors' attempts to downplay the potential risks posed by the accused Reuß group members, the danger of terrorism associated with their activities cannot be overlooked. The fight against terrorism requires a thorough examination of processes related to the group's operations in Munich and beyond. Authorities must remain vigilant in combating the rise of extremist groups, like the Reuß organization, which espouse violence and threaten democratic institutions. Moreover, the Reichsbürger movement, which shares some similarities with the Reuß group, also poses a threat, as it challenges the legitimacy of the German state and promotes conspiracy theories that can incite violence.
