Skip to content

The school of the future is the subject of controversial debate in Saxony

Few topics are discussed as passionately as education and schools. It is not only technology that is changing everyday school life. Saxony wants to be prepared and is therefore working on the school of the future.

Christian Piwarz (CDU, l), Minister of Culture of Saxony, takes a seat in the plenum next to....aussiedlerbote.de
Christian Piwarz (CDU, l), Minister of Culture of Saxony, takes a seat in the plenum next to Sebastian Gemkow (CDU). Photo.aussiedlerbote.de

Schools - The school of the future is the subject of controversial debate in Saxony

Top marks, new curricula and more autonomy for schools: The school of the future is the subject of controversial debate among experts in Saxony. This is the conclusion drawn by Minister of Education Christian Piwarz (CDU) on Thursday during the evaluation of five regional conferences on the "Saxony 2030 - A State of Education" project. From June to November, practitioners discussed 218 recommendations for action from experts. Some were met with great approval, others with much less enthusiasm.

Strong approval for numerous recommendations for action

Proposals for student participation in the design of lessons, concepts for self-organized learning and a revision and review of curricula in terms of relevance and skills acquisition were met with great approval. There was also a clear vote in favor of the recommendation to give schools more responsibility and to improve vocational orientation courses in all general education schools. The proposal to align lessons and the school day more closely with children and young people's biorhythms in future was the subject of controversial debate.

Opinions also clashed on the subject of head marks and grading. Head grades are much more subjective than other grades and have little influence on children's development. Opponents of head grades explained that people are assessed much more fairly with target agreements than with numerical values on a 5-point scale.

On the other hand, it has been pointed out several times that head marks could be an important criterion in application procedures, for example for apprenticeships or jobs. "We should keep and preserve what is tried and tested. However, things should also be accepted in order to obtain greater meaningfulness," said Piwarz.

Some proposals fell through with the experts

The recommendation to grant school vacations instead of school vacations in the future, which would allow families with children to take vacations regardless of fixed dates, was met with great rejection. Piwarz did not want to dismiss controversial proposals out of hand. He said that some things might have to be tested for their suitability. The results of the consultations will now be incorporated into a strategy paper in the spring.

No ban on artificial intelligence

There should also be no general ban on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) at the school of the future. Piwarz said that schools are already dealing with this today. By engaging with AI, pupils could also be encouraged to critically examine sources. "What surrounds young people every day and what they use in their private lives will also be used in schools. So schools have to deal with it." An AI ban would be nonsensical and "modern-day machine storming".

Read also:

Source: www.stern.de

Comments

Latest