Skip to content

Smaller state parliament: FDP sues to stop the referendum

The FDP in Baden-Württemberg fears an XXL state parliament. The Ministry of the Interior has now rejected a petition for a referendum to prevent this bloating. But the liberals are not giving up - they are taking the matter to the state's constitutional court.

Members of the state parliament take part in a vote on the budget during a plenary session in the....aussiedlerbote.de
Members of the state parliament take part in a vote on the budget during a plenary session in the state parliament of Baden-Württemberg. Photo.aussiedlerbote.de

Parties - Smaller state parliament: FDP sues to stop the referendum

In the coming days, the FDP intends to file a complaint with the Constitutional Court against the referendum to reduce the size of the state parliament, which has been stopped by the Ministry of the Interior. Faction leader Hans-Ulrich Rülke told the German Press Agency in Stuttgart: "It is completely absurd to claim that the bill is unconstitutional because it shifts the electoral law too much towards proportional representation." This is precisely what the Greens, CDU and SPD had already decided with the introduction of state lists, without anyone having made an issue of it.

Rülke went on to say that with a bloated XXL state parliament, only around a third of directly elected representatives would sit in the state parliament, as with the Liberals' "lean proposal", only far fewer in total.

Before Christmas, the Ministry of the Interior had declared that although the FDP had submitted sufficient signatures, the proposed bill was inadmissible for constitutional reasons. According to the FDP's draft, proportional representation would carry significantly more weight than the personal vote, according to the criticism. The FDP sees this as a tactical maneuver by Interior Minister Thomas Strobl (CDU). Rülke emphasized: "Thomas Strobl's motive is to accept a defeat in court, but so late that the reduction of the state parliament will not take effect until 2031." This would allow him to create as large a parliament as possible before then and possibly gain a seat in the state parliament himself, which the population has not yet given him. "If the current electoral law is constitutional, so is our proposal."

The sticking point is Article 28 of the state constitution

The FDP has submitted more than 10,000 signatures to the ministry. With the referendum, the Liberals wanted to reduce the number of constituencies in the south-west by almost half. The aim was to prevent the parliament from becoming bloated. Instead of 70, there should only be 38 constituencies in future, similar to the Bundestag elections. This would drastically reduce the probability of overhang and compensatory mandates, it was said. The FDP parliamentary group in the state parliament recently failed with a corresponding bill.

For the Ministry of the Interior, the FDP plan is unconstitutional. The fewer constituencies there are, the smaller the proportion of MPs who receive a direct mandate - i.e. who are elected to the state parliament directly from a constituency, the ministry stated. Specifically, this concerns Article 28 of the state constitution. In the ministry's view, the principle of personal election would be shifted too far in favor of proportional representation. Baden-Württemberg's state parliament election law is a mixed system of personal and proportional representation.

Constitutional Court

Read also:

Source: www.stern.de

Comments

Latest