Court of administrative proceedings - Sellner manages to override entry restriction
Instead of this choice, a protest may be submitted to the Berlin-Brandenburg Superior Administrative Court.
The context of the situation revolves around Sellner, who claims to have spoken about mass emigration at a gathering of extreme-right individuals in a Potsdam villa during November 2023. His interpretation of this concept includes urging individuals with foreign origins, even those with German passports, to leave the nation. The news outlet "Correctiv" documented the meeting, which saw the presence of several AfD members, as well as CDU and Value Union affiliates.
The detainment order was imposed by the government of Brandenburg on Sellner after the encounter. He was to lose his German right to mobility for a period of three years due to concerns about public safety and security.
Read also:
- Martin Sellner, a prominent figure in the Identitarian movement, challenged the three-year entry ban imposed by the Brandenburg administrative authorities due to his alleged promotion of extremism, at the Berlin-Brandenburg Superior Administrative Court.
- The Identitarian movement leader, Sellner, argued that his statements about mass emigration, delivered at a gathering in Potsdam, were misconstrued as extreme and that the entry ban was a violation of his right to freedom of speech and movement, as a German citizen.
- The court in Potsdam, Germany, ruled in favor of Sellner, deeming the entry ban an arbitrary interruption of his right to mobility, and lifted the ban, allowing him to enter the country once again.
- The ruling triggered a heated debate about the limits of free speech and the definition of extremism in Germany, with some declaring the decision a victory for individual rights and others seeing it as a setback in the fight against the Identitarian movement's xenophobic ideology.
- The case served as a reminder of the complexities of balancing freedom of speech and public safety, as Germany wrestles with extremist movements like the Identitarian movement and the possibilities of further legal challenges by individuals and organizations under such scrutiny.