Legal fairness is the subject of this news piece. - Saxony-Anhalt aims to assist overwhelmed administrative courts.
"The legal system needs data from the Federal Office for Migration concerning when and to what extent procedures are initiated for efficient processing in the court system," explained Weidinger. "Alongside this, all those involved in the asylum process must be adequately staffed."
The German state of Saxony-Anhalt sent in an application related to this matter. The reasoning behind this is that the number of pending cases at the administrative courts varies significantly, as per the Ministry of Justice. To reduce the duration of asylum procedures, this number should be regulated more effectively.
The aim is for cases to be handled as evenly as possible at the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees. This applies to people of different nationalities and the geographical distribution of decisions across the country. Over 241,500 asylum cases without a verdict were still unresolved at the end of March.
Read also:
- Saxony-Anhalt advocates for a more streamlined asylum procedure, calling for data from the Federal Office for Migration to aid administrative courts in effective case management.
- Franziska Weidinger, a representative from Saxony-Anhalt's Ministry of Justice, emphasized the importance of having sufficient staff in all aspects of the asylum process.
- Recognizing the significant variation in pending cases at administrative courts across the Federal states, Saxony-Anhalt submitted an application seeking to regulate asylum procedures more efficiently.
- The goal is to manage asylum cases equitably within the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees, ensuring fair treatment for individuals of diverse nationalities and geographical distribution of decisions nationwide.
- As of March's end, over 241,500 unresolved asylum cases without a verdict remained in the system, highlighting the need for improvements in handling these migration processes.
- Recently, Hanover's migration offices have also faced scrutiny for their control system, sparking conversations regarding the responsibility of federal and state governments in ensuring legal fairness in migration processes.