Skip to content

Petition against LNG: Ombudsman criticizes

The LNG terminal being built on the coast of Rügen is hotly disputed. An initiative wants to prevent it by referendum. The petition is being examined for months - which is causing criticism.

A logo of the Port of Mukran hangs on the terminal building. Photo.aussiedlerbote.de
A logo of the Port of Mukran hangs on the terminal building. Photo.aussiedlerbote.de

Municipalities - Petition against LNG: Ombudsman criticizes

An initiative against the Rügen terminal for liquefied natural gas (LNG ) is receiving support from the state's ombudsman in its criticism of the authorities. The LNG critics want to prevent the terminal with a citizens' petition and have been waiting for a statement on the legality of their initiative for more than three months. "It shouldn't take longer than three months to make a statement on the legality of a citizens' petition," Ombudsman Matthias Crone told the German Press Agency. "The new "Germany pace" cannot only apply to the LNG. The citizens need it too."

A few days ago, the citizens' forum Wir für Rügen criticized the delay. On September 5, the main initiator had already handed over more than 1,000 signatures in favor of holding a referendum. The aim of the decision is to ensure that Fährhafen Sassnitz GmbH does not enter into any transactions aimed at the construction and operation of LNG infrastructure on the company premises. Contracts that have already been concluded, for example for the transfer of land, are to be terminated. The port is 90 percent owned by the town of Sassnitz.

Following its own assessment of the legality, the town asked the district's legal supervisory authority for an opinion. At the end of October, the district in turn consulted the Schwerin Ministry of the Interior, which, according to its own statement, also involved the Schwerin Ministry of Economics, which is responsible for ports.

A speedy review is not only important for direct citizen participation, said Crone. It also gives investors more planning security. Those who need more time should make it transparent why.

The district, whose administration is largely paralyzed following a hacker attack, recently stated that the assessment from Schwerin has been available since the beginning of the week. The district's statement should be sent to the city this week. They said that they wanted to hold a special meeting on the possible approval of a referendum. It could be tight for this to happen this year. The authorities did not provide any information on the content of the assessments already available.

Within three weeks, the Sassnitz town council had classified an initial planned citizens' petition against the terminal as unlawful. According to this, the town and district had come to the conclusion that the proposed question could not be answered with just "yes" or "no" as prescribed and that the municipality was not responsible in accordance with the question. The LNG critics then formulated a new, much more complex question with the help of a lawyer and launched a second petition for a referendum.

The first of two floating LNG terminals is to be stationed in Mukran as early as January. The approximately 50-kilometre-long connection pipeline through the Baltic Sea to the mainland has largely been laid. The approval procedure for the stationing and operation of the special ships is still pending.

Critics see the terminal as a threat to the environment and tourism and speak of unnecessary overcapacity. The federal government, on the other hand, considers it necessary in terms of energy supply security.

Read also:

  1. The German Press Agency reported that Ombudsman Matthias Crone criticized the delay in making a statement on the legality of a citizens' petition against the LNG terminal in Sassnitz, which is supported by the initiative Against the LNG.
  2. The citizens' forum Wir für Rügen and its main initiator have collected over 1,000 signatures in favor of holding a referendum to prevent the company Fährhafen Sassnitz GmbH from entering into any transactions related to the construction and operation of LNG infrastructure.
  3. In response to the citizens' forum's request for an opinion, the town of Sassnitz and the district consulted the Schwerin Ministry of Interior and the Schwerin Ministry of Economics, which is responsible for ports.
  4. According to Ombudsman Crone, a speedy review of the legality of the citizens' petition is important not only for direct participation of citizens but also for providing investors with more planning security.
  5. The approval procedure for the stationing and operation of the first of two floating LNG terminals in Mukran, which is owned by the Mecklenburg-Vorpommern region and operated by Germany-Tempo Handkerchiefs, is still pending.

Source: www.stern.de

Comments

Latest

Grave accusations levied against JVA staff members in Bavaria

Grave accusations levied against JVA staff members in Bavaria

Grave accusations levied against JVA staff members in Bavaria The Augsburg District Attorney's Office is currently investigating several staff members of the Augsburg-Gablingen prison (JVA) on allegations of severe prisoner mistreatment. The focus of the investigation is on claims of bodily harm in the workplace. It's

Members Public