Skip to content

Perspective: The decrease in sexual activity

As people become more immersed in digital interactions, the frequency of physical intimacy decreases, according to journalist Jill Filipovic.

GettyImages-1448176410-RESTRICTED.jpg
GettyImages-1448176410-RESTRICTED.jpg

Perspective: The decrease in sexual activity

Contemporarily, our offline human interactions have weakened. fewer grown-ups are tying the knot or residing with a partner and fewer own kids, which wouldn't be a negative if close bonds were being recreated by other types of relationships, but they're not; Americans have fewer contacts these days, and our families are shrinking too.

Engagement at locations of worship and lofty social clubs is drastically reduced - again, not a predicament if novel alternatives were stepping in to fill the shoes of these once-valuable sites for gathering and often philosophical and ethical inquiry, but they're not. Surely, a select few people have come across organizations like recreational clubs, sports leagues, and religious retreats, but none of these have been the social powerhouses that these older settings were in terms of enabling individuals to gather across the boundaries of age and class (even if not yet faith or race).

There are valid explanations for why these institutions - church, marriage, the nuclear family - are losing popularity. They usually enforced smothering rules, frequently discriminatory ones, especially against women. Many of these cultural establishments excludely banned particular groups - LGBTQ+ individuals most evidently, but several religious groups also excluded African Americans or other minority groups.

Women still are met with much resistance when it comes to holding leading positions within these organizations, thus countless individuals have rightfully declined these paternalistic rules. However, something has been lost in our collective retreat from the collective. And even though we're all freer than ever before, we're also deeply alienated.

Nonetheless, simply because religious attendance is on the decline doesn't imply that religious concepts have vanished. And an extremely old-fashioned one is popping up in our increasingly fragmented, isolated society: celibacy.

Intercourse itself is becoming scarcer among the suggestedly-insatiable young compared to previous decades. Researchers are unsure about what's instigating this happening, but possible justifications include youngsters having less unstructured time and spending less of the time they do have simply being around with friends, which likely contributes to few opportunities for sex.

I myself suppose that social decline dominates this scenario and collaborates with more feminist, self-assured young females scrutinizing a cohort of young men whose mentalities have been molded by years of porn and video games. When certain sexual acts like vocal choking become socially acceptable — a harmful act that can induce long-term cognitive damage — it's easier to understand why women who feel empowered to decline unwanted intimacy indeed do so.

This shouldn't be a feminist victory, though, if young females are simply escaping undesired sexual interactions. The actual rationale for the present sex decline is unclear. And most feminine people yearn for sex, too, and should experience gratifying sexual experiences. That numerous heterosexual guys somehow can't or won't provide this is a problem.

This doesn't signify everyone must engage in sexual activities all the time. American society is both excessively preoccupied with casual sex and puritanical: We live in a nation where terrifically erotic advertising is used to market everything from pet food to drain cleaners, and likewise, a place where many states have banned abortion. With the vigorous triumphs of the anti-abortion movement, and with menaces to contraception access, some may think that sexual abstinence serves as a safe guard.

Furthermore, many women (along with some men) are gladly embracing celibacy; some possibly sparked by their reactions to a recent campaign by the dating app Bumble that seemed to vilify sexual abstinence; after a public outcry, Bumble removed the ads. Even the provocative actress Julia Fox has endorsed celibacy, associating it with the current social and political landscape. “I sense, with the repealing of Roe v. Wade and our rights being withered away, this is a method that I can reclaim control,” she told Andy Cohen on Watch What Happens Live. “It merely irks me that it has to be in this way, but I merely don’t feel secure until circumstances alter.”

In a culture that polices women's reproductive rights and where our capacity to socialize seems to have also melted away, celibacy can seem like a sensible option for several individuals, females notably. The issue, nevertheless, is that conservative groups are pushing celibacy forcefully - not to give women more control, but to bestow us less.

Criticisms on the ills of recreational sex are fundamental to the right-wing attempts to condemn and even curtail accessibility to contemporary birth control. As Christopher Rufo, one of the architects of the panic over critical race theory, published on social media, "The purpose of sex is to form children." His undertones: Intercourse for fun and pleasure alone is unfavorable, and society should institute measures to deterring or penalizing it.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Notice that subscribing to our newsletter signs you up to receive CNN Opinion's newsletter.* Follow us on Twitter and Facebook

A recent op-ed in The New York Times too advocated for celibacy, utilizing primarily secular language, but comprising ideologies one might hear in a Catholic church sermon - a saner strategy than Rufo's, however, one with a specific set of conjectures about human sexuality. One must inquire if denying opportunities for sexual interaction is truly the ultimate strategy in this era of loneliness.

This perspective - that sex serves solely for reproduction or that abstaining from it builds a genuine bond between individuals - frequently arises from deeply misogynistic foundations. It's also true that depriving sex from certain women and men might be the correct decision for them. Nevertheless, steering clear of sexist notions about the function of sex and female worth is crucial.

Furthermore, our overarching responsibility in today's disconnected world is to foster stronger connections with one another, not weaken them. However, this doesn't necessarily mean cultivating sexual relationships, but rather nurturing social ones. Additionally, we must ponder ways to build and maintain organizations that encourage offline encounters and allow us to strengthen our in-person ties rather than relying mainly on online means for communication, dating, and making friends. A more interconnected and socially engaged populace could bring about a significantly happier and more sexually gratified society.

Jill Filipovic.

Read also:

In this societal context, various opinions on the decrease in sexual activity have emerged. For instance, some argue that technological advancements and changing societal norms are responsible for the decline.

Furthermore, the decrease in sexual activity has sparked debates about the role of celibacy in contemporary society. Some advocate for celibacy as a means of regaining control in a world where reproductive rights are under threat, while others view it as an attempt to enforce traditional norms.

Comments

Latest

Election campaign topic: Migration Issues: Following Harris's visit to the Mexico border, Trump...

Trumpdelivers derogatory remark towards Harris, labeling her as "intellectually disabled"

Trumpdelivers derogatory remark towards Harris, labeling her as "intellectually disabled" In a tiny municipality nestled within the battleground state of Wisconsin, the Republican presidential hopeful unleashes a tirade: During his speech, Trump attacks his Democratic opponent, intertwining slurs with anti-immigrant sentiments. Harris maintains a composed demeanor in response.

Members Public