Doctors take action against triage rules before the Federal Constitutional Court
The regulations violate the fundamental rights of doctors, explained the Marburger Bund. They violate professional freedom and freedom of conscience. Medical practitioners would be "forced to make borderline decisions that contradict their professional self-image and cause them blatant problems of conscience".
The law stipulates that the decision may only be made according to the current and short-term survival probability of the patients concerned. However, it is contradictory and too imprecise, criticize the complainants, who work in intensive care or emergency medicine.
They also object to the ban on ex-post triage, i.e. doctors being allowed to stop treating one patient in favor of another with a better chance of survival. The Marburger Bund criticized the fact that they are expected to make decisions "in the knowledge that they will not be able to provide intensive medical treatment to patients who arrive later and have a much better chance of survival".
This increases the already high level of stress in such a situation. Doctors would no longer be able to do everything in their power to "save the greatest possible number of people under the difficult circumstances of an extreme shortage of resources".
Both regulations made it impossible to act in accordance with medical principles in a dilemma situation, the report continued. They also caused "considerable legal uncertainty and a significant risk of criminal liability".
Read also:
- This will change in December
- German activists speak out in Dubai on suffering in Israel and the Gaza Strip
- Nuclear fusion - hype or solution to energy problems?
- Budget crisis fuels debate on citizen's income - Bas warns against populism
Source: www.stern.de
