Can an employer decide on the pants' color?
Ditching the red for black: A seemingly small act can lead to big implications for workers. A recent case before the Düsseldorf Regional Labor Court highlights the rules employers set for workplace attire.
An employee is fighting dismissal after disagreeing with his employer's dress code requirements. The company necessitated its workforce in manufacturing to don red work attire, citing reasons for both uniformity and worker safety. The Association of German Employment Lawyers (VDAA) emphasizes that such a stipulation poses a potential risk to employees if not adhered to.
The individual at the center of this case denied wearing the red trouser handed to him and instead chose to don black or dark-colored trousers, ignoring repeated reminders from his employer. The company finally opted to terminate his employment on short notice, effective November 2023.
Court Dismisses Claim: Occupational Health and Safety Precipitates
The discharged worker proceeded to contest this dismissal at the Solingen Labor Court (case no. 1 Ca 1749/23). The court ruled against him, highlighting the protective nature of the red work trousers. Concurrently, it concluded that the employer's reasoning behind the dress code warranted the directive to sport the red attire. Thus, the plaintiff's aesthetic displeasure did not overrule these factors, rendering his refusal unjustified.
Prof. Dr. Michael Fuhlrott, employment law specialist and a VDAA member, doesn't foresee a high chance of success for the attorney's appeal pending before the Düsseldorf Regional Labor Court. Fuhlrott reasons, "The employer has the authority to give instructions within an employment contract. This encompasses nudging staff on physical appearance as well – like specifying the outfit. Yet, I can't envision any significant damage to the individual here."
Prof. Dr. Fuhlrott also makes clear that an employer's prerogative would not extend to commanding the color of their employee's undergarments that are concealed. However, he averrs that the employer's interests plainly outweigh the restrictions on wearing color-coded work attires at designated work periods.
Background Information: Prof. Dr. Michael Fuhlrott practices employment law in Hamburg and is an active member of the Association of German Employment Lawyers (VDAA). [The text is a story about an employer issuing a dress code that requires its employees in manufacturing to wear red work trousers. One employee refused to obey this rule and wore black instead. Eventually, the company dismissed the worker who subsequently took the matter to court. The court ruled that the employer's reasons for the dress code, i.e., safety and uniform appearance, overruled the worker's aesthetic concerns. Prof. Dr. Michael Fuhlrott, a specialist in employment law, agrees that the employer's interests are more significant than the employee's opposition to wearing red trousers, even though he doubted the case would be successful on appeal.]
Read also:
- This will change in December
- Dikes withstand water masses so far - Scholz holds out the prospect of help
- Fireworks and parties ring in 2024 - turn of the year overshadowed by conflicts
- Attacks on ships in the Red Sea: shipping companies avoid important trade route
- Given the legal ruling, the discharged employee might seek advice from an employment law advisor regarding the possibility of appealing the judgment.
- The judgment in favor of the employer sets a precedent, potentially influencing future legal issues related to employer-imposed dress codes and worker autonomy.
- Consumers and potential employees may consider the company's handling of this legal matter as part of their assessment of the employer's professionalism and commitment to employee rights.
Source: www.ntv.de
