Skip to content

Bundesgerichtshof ponders Martin Kind's termination at Hannover 96.

Approximately two years ago, Hannover 96 attempted to dismiss Martin Kind from his role as managing director. Kind managed to defend himself in two legal battles. The conflict persists now at Germany's top civil court.

Martin Kind, Managing Director of Hannover 96, is in the stadium before the game.
Martin Kind, Managing Director of Hannover 96, is in the stadium before the game.

Football matches on schedule. There are upcoming soccer matches to be played according to the schedule provided. - Bundesgerichtshof ponders Martin Kind's termination at Hannover 96.

Approaching the 2-year mark since Martin Kind's unsuccessful removal as director of second-division football club Hannover 96, the Federal Court of Justice in Karlsruhe will tackle the case on Tuesday (10:00 am). Back in 2022, the Regional Court of Hanover decreed Kind's dismissal to be invalid, while the Higher Regional Court of Celle refused to entertain an appeal six months later. Now, the Karlsruhe magistrates are settling the feud between the football club administrator and its mother company. The outcome of this dispute may or may not be made public on Tuesday.

Kind, aged 79, is both the administrator and majority shareholder of the professional football division. The 50+1 rule, a staple in German professional football, aims to ensure that the parent club, not the wealthy affiliate, holds the majority of votes during such a corporate split. To abide by this principle, the managing director of Hannover 96 is stationed at the Management GmbH, a company not owned by Kind, but 100% by the parent club.

Citing this, the e.V. management axed Kind as managing director of the Hannover 96 Management GmbH in July 2022. The two parties have been locked in a long-standing conflict. Kind triumphed in his legal fight against his dismissal as the organization and its wealthy counterpart had forged the so-called Hannover-96 contract in 2019, which outlines their relationship. This pact includes a clause that states the status quo of the Management GmbH can only be modified, and a managing director can only be sacked, if the supervisory board of the Management GmbH approves. Within this council, there are two voting setups from the club side and two from the capital side.

Read also:

  1. Despite the ongoing legal battle between Martin Kind and Hanover 96, the soccer team is still scheduled to play matches in Bundesliga 2, as per the league's schedule.
  2. The Federal Court of Justice in Karlsruhe is set to recall the case of Martin Kind's termination, which was initially declared invalid by the Hanover Regional Court.
  3. As the case heads to the Federal Court of Justice, it highlights the importance of understanding various corporate processes and rules in German soccer, such as the 50+1 rule.
  4. Located in Lower Saxony, Hanover 96's legal dispute with Martin Kind has gone through several rounds, including appeals to the Higher Regional Court of Celle.
  5. Regardless of the outcome of the case, the outcome of the trial in the Federal Court of Justice in Karlsruhe will undoubtedly have significant implications for Hannover 96 and the management of professional soccer clubs in Germany.
  6. With Martin Kind serving both as administrator and majority shareholder of Hanover 96, the processes and procedures surrounding his dismissal and the association's response have captured the attention of soccer fans across Germany.

Comments

Latest

Grave accusations levied against JVA staff members in Bavaria

Grave accusations levied against JVA staff members in Bavaria

Grave accusations levied against JVA staff members in Bavaria The Augsburg District Attorney's Office is currently investigating several staff members of the Augsburg-Gablingen prison (JVA) on allegations of severe prisoner mistreatment. The focus of the investigation is on claims of bodily harm in the workplace. It's

Members Public