Skip to content
Sign In Subscribe
German Federal States — News — Bavaria — firing rule — North Rhine-Westphalia — Environment — Science — Wolves — munster — Conferences — Animals — Society — Munich — EU — Free voters — Germany — Wolf — agrarian — Thorsten Glauber

Bavaria's wolf shooting rules do not go far enough

In Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, the federal and state governments discuss how to deal with wolves. In the end, Bavaria agrees to the federal government's proposal - but at the same time insists on its fundamental criticism.

,   and  ZEITUNG «AUSSIEDLERBOTE»
3 min read
A wolf runs through a forest. Photo.aussiedlerbote.de
A wolf runs through a forest. Photo.aussiedlerbote.de

Conferences - Bavaria's wolf shooting rules do not go far enough

The federal and state governments have agreed on some simpler options for shooting wolves - but the new regulations still do not go far enough for Bavaria. "The resolutions of the Conference of Environment Ministers can only be a first step. Further legal changes are necessary. The federal government and the EU have a role to play here," said Bavaria's head of department Thorsten Glauber (Free Voters) in Munich on Friday. Specifically, the Free State of Bavaria continues to demand a new legal basis that allows shooting regardless of possible kills based purely on the number of animals in a region.

Specifically, the resolution of the Conference of Environment Ministers (UMK) for the rapid shooting of wolves requires that they have killed livestock despite existing herd protection measures such as fences. In addition, the federal states are to be able to define certain regions with an increased number of wolf killings, in which a DNA analysis does not have to be awaited before shooting.

The Bund Naturschutz in Bavaria stated that the UMK's decision was practical and justifiable. "For us, the decisive factor is that herd protection was practiced," state head Richard Mergner told the German Press Agency. If Glauber now demanded even more far-reaching regulations, this was "unworthy of an environment minister who is supposed to be committed to solving problems".

Glauber, who did not personally attend the conference in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, declared: "We will keep up the pressure on the wolf issue." He once again called on the federal government to "finally implement the Habitats Directive in full". "This will clear the way for regionally differentiated population management. It is also necessary to lobby the EU to lower the protection status of the wolf. The current situation is unsatisfactory." Livestock farmers and farmers had also called for more far-reaching measures.

During the vote in Münster, Bavaria agreed to the proposals presented by Federal Environment Minister Steffi Lemke (Greens) back in October, contrary to what the reaction would suggest. In a statement for the minutes, however, Bavaria declared that the regulations did not go far enough and that it considered a fundamental change in the law to be necessary.

The Chairman of the UMK, North Rhine-Westphalia's Environment Minister Oliver Krischer (Greens), however, emphasized: "We have achieved a breakthrough." Herd protection is crucial for the least possible conflict between livestock farming and wolf populations. "However, we also need a more practical and legally secure approach throughout Germany to remove individual wolves that are displaying unusual behavior." Lemke also explained that the new rules are compatible with EU law. The approach to problematic wolves is also a sign of reconciliation in order to pacify the social conflict.

Lesen Sie auch:

  1. In response to the agreement on simplified wolf shooting rules, Bavaria's head of department Thorsten Glauber (Free Voters) from Munich expressed dissatisfaction, stating that it only represents a first step and further legal changes are necessary.
  2. During the Conference of Environment Ministers (UMK) in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Bavaria agreed to the proposals presented by Federal Environment Minister Steffi Lemke (Greens) in October, but declared that the regulations did not go far enough.
  3. The resolution from the UMK requires wolves to have killed livestock despite existing herd protection measures such as fences, and allows the federal states to define certain regions with an increased number of wolf killings where DNA analysis does not need to be waited for before shooting.
  4. Despite the UMK's decision being called practical and justifiable by the Bund Naturschutz in Bavaria, Bavaria's head of department Thorsten Glauber demanded even more far-reaching regulations, calling for the implementation of the Habitats Directive in full and lobbying the EU to lower the protection status of the wolf.
  5. Livestock farmers and farmers in Germany have also called for more far-reaching measures, as they continuously experience conflicts with wolf populations.
  6. The Chairman of the UMK, Oliver Krischer (Greens), emphasized that a breakthrough had been achieved, as herd protection is crucial for minimizing conflicts between livestock farming and wolf populations.
  7. However, Krischer and Lemke agreed that a more practical and legally secure approach is necessary throughout Germany to remove individual wolves displaying unusual behavior.
  8. Thorsten Glauber, who represents the agrarian interests of Bavaria, continues to call for regionally differentiated population management and further legal changes in the wolf issue, believing that it will contribute to the resolution of social conflicts and address the current unsatisfactory situation.

Source: www.stern.de

Comments

Related

Latest