Skip to content

Authorization granted for pigeon reduction in Limburg

Whether to use a falconer to eliminate pigeons in Limburg was a controversial matter. Locals have made a choice concerning this matter.

Pigeons scramble for bread.
Pigeons scramble for bread.

Creatures - Authorization granted for pigeon reduction in Limburg

In Limburg, citizens have spoken on the matter of killing pigeons. On Sunday, a citizen's vote revealed that 53.45% of the participants were in favor of a solution proposed by the city council last year. The results were shared by the city in the evening.

The council had previously made a decision, supported by a majority, to hire a falconer to address the pigeon issue. During discussions, the idea of breaking the birds' necks to kill them was raised. Earlier, a count had revealed the presence of around 700 pigeons in the city.

This decision led to objections from animal rights groups and various responses from across Germany. The council responded by calling for a citizen's vote after enough signatures were collected against killing the birds.

In total, approximately 26,500 citizens of Limburg were eligible to participate in the vote. The voting process took place alongside the European election and the county council election in the Limburg-Weilburg district.

Mayor Marius Hahn (SPD) commented on the result, stating, "We didn't anticipate how the outcome would be today. The citizens have exercised their right and decided that the pigeon population will be reduced using a falconer who stuns and kills the birds within the next two years."

Animal rights activists expected a "compassionate outcome in the citizens' vote." They believed that Limburg citizens "would choose the morally correct option and therefore against the gruesome killing of pigeons by breaking their necks - that's outdated and inappropriate when dealing with wild animals under human care."

Both the German Animal Welfare Federation and the State Animal Welfare Association Hesse, along with the Animal Welfare Association Limburg, urged voters not to support the killing of pigeons.

In citizen votes, voters must answer a question that can be answered with "yes" or "no." The outcome is determined by the majority of valid votes. Additionally, this majority must represent a minimum share of eligible voters in the city, which varies depending on the population. In this case, 25% of the eligible votes in Limburg equated to at least 6,662 participants having to cast their vote. If these numbers are not met by either the "yes" or the "no" votes, the municipal council must discuss and decide on the matter again.

Read also:

  1. Despite strong opposition from animal rights groups in Germany and advocates for pigeon conservation, municipalities like Hesse have chosen to hold referendums on pigeon control measures, such as the one recently held in Limburg.
  2. In response to the high number of pigeons in their city, Municipalities across Germany have turned to innovative solutions such as hiring falconers to manage pigeon populations, as seen in Limburg's decision to bring in a falconer after the referendum results.
  3. Animals rights activists in cities like Limburg are urging citizens to vote against methods such as breaking pigeons' necks and instead support more humane bird control methods during local municipal elections, such as the citizen's vote held on Sunday.
  4. In the aftermath of Limburg's referendum on pigeon population control, several municipalities across Germany are closely monitoring the outcomes and considering implementing similar voting processes to address wildlife management issues that resonate with their constituents.

Comments

Latest

Grave accusations levied against JVA staff members in Bavaria

Grave accusations levied against JVA staff members in Bavaria

Grave accusations levied against JVA staff members in Bavaria The Augsburg District Attorney's Office is currently investigating several staff members of the Augsburg-Gablingen prison (JVA) on allegations of severe prisoner mistreatment. The focus of the investigation is on claims of bodily harm in the workplace. It's

Members Public