Israel's confiscation of AP equipment unveils their hostile stance toward the free media.
Editor's Note: The following article first appeared in the "Reliable Sources" newsletter. Sign up here for daily updates on the ever-changing media landscape.
Yesterday, the Israeli government led by Benjamin Netanyahu audaciously confiscated a camera and other video equipment belonging to The Associated Press, used to broadcast a live feed from Gaza. This decision sparked fury and drew backlash from free speech advocates, leading to the government's hasty abandonment of its actions.
Adrienne Watson, spokesperson for the National Security Council, confirmed the influence of high-level American intercession when she informed me that the US had voiced serious concerns to the Israeli government about the confiscation. This intervention appears to have played a significant role in the country's decision to publicly reverse its stance.
However, the audacious move against the AP is only the latest in a series of anti-media tactics employed by Israel while engaged in its bloody war with Hamas. The country's leadership, which has dodged accountability for the death and mistreatment of journalists in the region, has for months remained unresponsive to queries. Just last month, a law was passed granting authority to close down the Qatari-owned Al Jazeera network. Authorities carried out a raid on Al Jazeera's offices and shut down the channel. Following the same logic, they used this law on Tuesday to target the AP, claiming they confiscated its equipment because it provided its video feed to Al Jazeera, one of their countless global clients.
As a democratic nation, Israel ought to embrace the principles and ideals that make up a free society, acting as a beacon to an area where autocratic regimes dominate. But the country's behavior toward the press in recent days increasingly resembles the actions of authoritarian regimes that strive to control information and stifle dissent.
While the government did return the AP's equipment, no public apology was offered. Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi merely stated that he had "ordered that the equipment be returned to the AP news agency."
The lack of remorse coupled with the continued validity of the law enacted against Al Jazeera illustrates the Israeli government's feelings toward the press in the midst of its conflict with Hamas. Beyond the equipment return, unresolved concerns linger. The AP commented on the situation, saying they were "pleased with this development" but were "remaining concerned about the Israeli government's use of the foreign broadcaster law and the ability of independent journalists to operate freely in Israel."
Read also:
- Lack of snow also opens up new opportunities for winter tourism
- Abrupt end to e-car subsidies
- The chemical industry has little confidence
- Intersport boss hopes for sales boom through sporting events
Source: edition.cnn.com
