Skip to content

Legal Dispute on Fitness Agreement Resolved

David Beckham files lawsuit against Mark Wahlberg's fitness business for contract violation; case resolved.

Mark Wahlberg (left) and David Beckham reached an agreement before the trial.
Mark Wahlberg (left) and David Beckham reached an agreement before the trial.

David Beckham and Mark Wahlberg make headlines in news. - Legal Dispute on Fitness Agreement Resolved

David Beckham (49) and Mark Wahlberg (53) have come to a resolution before their trial. In the spring, it was disclosed that Beckham had sued the actor and his wellness firm F45 through his company DB Ventures Ltd. The lawsuit sought numerous millions, asserting that Beckham had been deceived by Wahlberg owing to a breach of contract. Per a statement from F45 Training received by People magazine, the legal conflict has been solved.

F45 Training indicated that they "have reached a settlement on the prior lawsuit from DB Ventures Limited, concerning a brand ambassador deal for David Beckham." The athlete will persist as an investor in the fitness firm. "We're delighted that we've made a joint business choice," commented Tom Dowd, the CEO of F45 Training.

F45 supposedly cheated and took advantage of David Beckham

As suggested by court documents acquired by People, Beckham registered the suit as early as October 2022. He insists on receiving around 18.8 million dollars, or roughly €17 million, owing to a breach of contract concerning a marketing accord with F45, one signed in 2020.

Beckham suggests he was not given ample remuneration for his partnership with Wahlberg's company. He claimed to have been guaranteed stock bundles for the fitness arrangement, yet they were not initially moved to him. The supposed deliberate postponement resulted in millions of dollars in losses due to tumbling stock values. Beckham's legal team argued that the company profited from its connection with Beckham, warranting additional profit sharing.

The lawsuit was due to be heard at the courthouse in January 2025, but a settlement was struck on June 6.

Read also:

Comments

Latest