Skip to content

Supreme Court Controversy Surrounds Mask Decision for Family Judge from Weimar

The Coronavirus outbreak continues to dominate proceedings at the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) in Karlsruhe. At 10:30 AM on Wednesday, the court will hear arguments in a case concerning a family court judge from Weimar, who instituted a ban on masks and other safety measures in two schools...

Supreme Court Controversy Surrounds Mask Decision for Family Judge from Weimar

The 2021 decision garnered nationwide focus, ultimately getting revoked. Back then, the Higher Regional Court in Jena and the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) made it clear that family courts lack jurisdiction in such matters. Currently, the query revolves around the durability of the Erfurt verdict. Both the family court judge and the public prosecutor's office advocate for a reassessment by the supreme court.

In light of the recent developments, there have been calls for the supreme court to reevaluate the Erfurt verdict, with both the family court judge and the public prosecutor's office voicing their support. This issue is of particular interest because the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) previously stated that family court judges do not have jurisdiction over such matters.

Read also:

Comments

Latest

Scholz and Merz engaged in a meeting on Monday, delving into the repercussions stemming from the...

Scholz upholds the fundamental right of asylum for individuals

Scholz upholds the fundamental right of asylum for individuals In Germany, the principle of individual asylum seizure is firmly established. Despite this, Friedrich Merz advocates for halting the influx of individuals from Syria and Afghanistan, aiming to implement this change "practically" without necessitating an alteration to the Basic

Members Public