Discussing politics in the workplace can yield both advantages and disadvantages, according to Gallup's investigation.
Working might not provide an escape from the political turmoil.
Recently, Gallup published a survey which revealed that approximately 45% of US employees discussed political matters with their coworkers in February, while 38% merely overheard these discussions.
The survey further pointed out that workers in sectors predominantly populated by conservative employees (60%) were more inclined to engage in political conversations than those in industries with a liberal lean (48%). Additionally, men were found to engage in such debates more frequently than women.
However, not everyone felt at ease with these political spats. 12% admitted to feeling uncomfortable, and 3% claimed they were treated unfairly for expressing their opinions. On the positive side, 14% felt that such conversations bolstered their sense of belonging, while 11% reported developing a closer bond with their colleagues due to these discussions.
Engaged employees were less likely to report feeling uncomfortable, implying that employee engagement might act as a barrier against discomfort during political discussions. Gallup proposed that this could lead employees to view their colleagues' opposing viewpoints more favorably, even if they disagree.
Although the survey did not delve into the comfort levels of the 38% who overheard such debates, Gallup suggested this may have been mixed, referring to a research paper published earlier this year in the Journal of Applied Psychology. This research suggested that overhearing political conversations could both hinder progress towards goals and reduce job satisfaction for employees who perceive themselves as having divergent viewpoints, while providing a more positive outlook for those who agreed with what they heard.
Navigate hidden perils
Given the intensity of emotions surrounding various topics this election season, workplace experts advise leaders and employees to approach such discussions with caution to prevent these debates from disrupting team unity.
This includes leaders setting clear guidelines for these exchanges, suggested Christy Pruitt-Haynes, the global head of the talent practice at the NeuroLeadership Institute. For instance, leaders might say, "Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but we will not tolerate personal attacks, verbal or physical; nor will we tolerate talking down to someone if their opinion differs."
Similarly, any executive implementing these boundaries should also adhere to them. It's advisable for private-sector leaders to avoid expressing their views on contentious issues, argued HR consultant Cindy O'Peka, who primarily works with small and medium-sized businesses. "It could foster an 'us' versus 'them' mentality at work, which is not conducive to a positive team dynamic."
Despite the survey indicating that political conversations can foster a sense of belonging for some employees, private-sector leaders should consider avoiding expressing their views on contentious issues to prevent fostering an 'us' versus 'them' mentality in the business. The intensity of emotions surrounding political topics this election season necessitates approaching these discussions with caution to shield the business from potential disruptions.
